What they wanted to achieve

The homeowners wanted to review the mortgage on their existing home before their current fixed period ended.

They had worked with Duane before and returned to compare the overall package available from other major New Zealand banks. The review needed to consider the rates, cash contribution and practical steps involved in changing lenders.

An existing day-to-day banking relationship also mattered. The recommendation considered how the proposed change would work in practice, alongside the lending terms.

How Duane helped

01

Compare the whole package

Duane reviewed the existing mortgage balances and compared several major banks. His recommendation considered interest rates, the available cash contribution and the practical differences between lenders.

02

Explain the costs and conditions

He explained refinancing costs, the need to check any early-repayment charge and the conditions attached to a cash contribution. Rate choices, repayment options and the solicitor and insurance requirements were also discussed.

03

Work through the lender’s requirements

After the clients chose their lender, Duane prepared the application, obtained additional information requested by the bank and progressed the lending through unconditional approval and loan-document preparation.

04

Resolve the document handover

When the solicitor’s office could not locate the loan documents, Duane checked with the bank, clarified where they had been sent and arranged a replacement set so the final steps could continue.

Refinance completed and new loan advanced

The lender confirmed that the new home loan had been advanced. A cash contribution was included in the agreed package. The outcome was a completed refinance, with the change of lender followed through beyond approval.

A useful lesson for your own plans

A mortgage review needs to weigh the overall package and the work involved in changing lenders.

This case shows how the comparison, application and final paperwork fit together. Practical support matters through to the new lending being advanced.

This is an anonymised case study, not a testimonial or a promise of an equivalent outcome. It describes an individual experience. Current lending criteria and your circumstances will determine the options available.